During a discussion on the “Full seed Podcast,” UFC President Dana White made an analogy between the widespread disapproval he encountered for canceling a UFC fight and the difficulties experienced by individuals coming out as gay in the 1980s.
White explained that he believes the negative reactions from the public when he cancelled a highly anticipated match between Jon Jones and Francis Ngannou, resulting from a contract disagreement, mirrored the kind of discrimination the LGBTQ+ community faced historically. His comparison sought to highlight what he perceives as similarities between this modern form of public backlash and past prejudices.
This analogy stirred a variety of reactions on social media, where people either commended or criticized White for equating his experiences with the profound struggles of the LGBTQ+ community. Despite facing opposition, White stood resolute regarding his assertions, reaffirming his commitment to what he expressed during the podcast.
A known advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, White’s previous acts of support include his recognition by GLAAD, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, which awarded him the “Straight Ally Award” in 2019.
The discourse surrounding Dana White’s comments reflects broader societal conversations about the nature and impact of cancel culture, which continues to be a contentious topic. This ongoing debate underscores the evolving dynamics of public discourse in the digital age.
